This lecture will argue that the real debate about anti-terrorist legislation in the UK is not about whether it is necessary, but about what characteristics it should have and about how four competing objectives can simultaneously be fulfilled: responsible management of often incalculable risk, and compliance with democracy, the rule of law, and human rights. The first step towards finding answers lies in properly assessing the kind of crisis the UK faces. By contrasting this with the experience of Northern Ireland, and by considering key elements in the contemporary legislative response, some conclusions will be drawn about the sort of anti-terrorist laws which can currently be justified and about whether or not they have created ‘suspect communities’.



